4.1 Article

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 174-200

Publisher

MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOC
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.962

Keywords

systematic reviews; reporting guidelines; search strategies; literature search; information retrieval; reproducibility

Funding

  1. University of Utah's Center for Clinical and Translational Science under the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR002538]
  2. Cancer Research UK [C49297/A27294]
  3. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award [DE200101618]
  4. University Research Chair, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
  5. Systematic Reviews Special Interest Group (SIG) of the Medical Library Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This document presents the PRISMA-S checklist, developed through a Delphi survey process and public review. The checklist includes sixteen reporting items, with exemplar reporting and rationale, aiming to ensure complete reporting of literature search components for reproducibility.
Background: Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, the literature searching component of systematic reviews and related review types is often poorly reported. Guidance for literature search reporting has been diverse and, in many cases, does not offer enough detail to authors who need more specific information about reporting search methods and information sources in a clear, reproducible way. This document presents the PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension) checklist, and explanation and elaboration. Methods: The checklist was developed using a three-stage Delphi survey process, followed by a consensus conference and public review process. Results: The final checklist includes sixteen reporting items, each of which is detailed with exemplar reporting and rationale. Conclusions: The intent of PRISMA-S is to complement the PRISMA Statement and its extensions by providing a checklist that could be used by interdisciplinary authors, editors, and peer reviewers to verify that each component of a search is completely reported and, therefore, reproducible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available