4.3 Article

Digital Navigator on the Seas of the Selden Map of China: Sequential Least-Cost Path Analysis Using Dynamic Wind Data

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD AND THEORY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 688-721

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-021-09534-6

Keywords

GIS; Least-cost path; Sailing; Selden Map of China; Southeast Asia; South China Sea

Funding

  1. University of Helsinki

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a novel method for simulating directed sail-powered voyages using ArcGIS Pro functionality through Python macros. The model performs well in favorable winds but struggles to simulate tacking properly in adverse conditions.
During the age of sail-powered ships, the maritime trade networks of Southeast Asia were highly cyclical in nature due to the biannually switching wind directions of the East Asian Monsoon. The Selden Map of China provides us with a glimpse of these connections in the early seventeenth century, and it is drawn in a unique way that allows the sailing durations between ports to be measured. In this paper, a novel method of simulating directed sail-powered voyages is developed. The method utilizes ArcGIS Pro's functionality through Python macros, and unlike the previous least-cost path (LCP) sailing models, it is based on sequential LCP analysis using dynamic real-time series wind data. The optimized routes and sailing durations generated by the macros are then compared against the Selden map. In general, the model performs reasonably well in favourable winds, but is unable to simulate tacking properly in adverse conditions. The results allow the visualization of wind patterns in terms of time spent at sea and demonstrate the inherent natural rhythm of maritime movement and trade in the South China Sea region. The macros are freely available and can be modified to simulate directed sailing in other time periods, localities, and environmental settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available