4.3 Article

Afterschool engagement: a mixed methods approach to understanding profiles of youth engagement

Journal

APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 638-656

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2021.1947140

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engagement in afterschool programs is a growing area of interest for researchers and practitioners, yet little is known about how specific dimensions of engagement vary among different subgroups of students. This study identified three engagement profiles and examined sources and barriers of engagement, providing insights for practitioners seeking to promote student engagement in afterschool programs.
Engagement in afterschool programs is a growing area of interest for both researchers and practitioners. Though there is an emerging body of research investigating this construct, we lack an understanding of how specific dimensions of engagement are endorsed in different ways among subgroups of students. Little is known about the sources and barriers of engagement in afterschool contexts. This mixed methods investigation used latent profile analysis and semi-structured student focus groups to explore individual differences in engagement and sources and barriers of engagement for a sample of underrepresented minority students who regularly participate in an afterschool program. Latent profile analyses revealed three engagement profiles: moderately engaged, affectively engaged, and disengaged. Reported sources (e.g., program content, friends) and barriers (e.g., interpersonal tension, repetitive content) differed by profile. The results provide a comprehensive understanding of student engagement in afterschool programs and are relevant to practitioners who desire to promote engagement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available