4.5 Article

Public transport competitiveness vs. the car: Impact of relative journey time and service attributes

Journal

RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101098

Keywords

Public transport; Commuting; Revealed preference; Public transport competitiveness; Public transport planning

Funding

  1. Norwegian Automobile Federation NAF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combines data on mode choice from the Norwegian National Travel Survey with evidence-based trip characteristics from Google Maps to explore the demand and market effects of relative travel times and other non-monetary public transport quality factors. The main finding is that high public transport shares require efficient travel times, direct routes, and high service frequency, illustrating how these factors affect the choice of public transport over car on commute trips.
In order to give empirically based policy advice on public transport (PT) competitiveness, we have studied revealed mode choice for commuting trips. This has been done by combining data on mode choice from the Norwegian National Travel Survey (NTS) with evidence-based, as opposed to static level-of-service data, trip characteristics extracted from Google Maps' travel planner. This combination enables us to explore the demand and market effects of relative travel times and other non-monetary PT quality factors. Our main finding is that high PT shares require that all of the studied factors; efficient travel times, direct routes or few transfers, and high service frequency is in place. If either one of these are not in place, the market share for PT is significantly reduced. The study contributes to the literature on transport mode choice by combining travel characteristics with revealed mode choice data, and showing how the relative travel time and other service attributes affect the choice of PT over car on commute trips.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available