4.5 Article

Promoting Concern for Climate Change: A Study of Wildfire Photographs Using Q Methodology

Journal

SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 624-650

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10755470211041689

Keywords

wildfire; imagery; Q methodology; climate change; climate change communication

Categories

Funding

  1. Center for Advanced Media Studies at the University of Nevada Reno
  2. Reynolds School of Journalism at the University of Nevada Reno

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses Q methodology to identify different responses to wildfire imagery and climate change concern, revealing three main perspectives on what images individuals are most concerned about. The findings suggest that there is variation in the level of concern for different types of images, including catastrophic destruction, smokescapes, human or animal suffering, as well as scenes of aid and support and officials' rescue meetings. These results contribute to the literature on visual communication of climate change and have implications for selecting images that appeal to diverse perspectives in the wider public.
This study employs Q methodology to identify responses to wildfire imagery and climate change concern. Using photographs shared on Twitter during California's 2018 Camp Fire, findings reveal three different perspectives on what images evoked the most concern among individuals: catastrophic destruction, smokescapes, and human or animal suffering. Results also reveal the images that evoke the least concern, such as scenes of aid and support and officials' rescue meetings. These results extend literature on the role of visuals in climate change communication and have implications for the selection of images that appeal to the various perspectives of the broader public.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available