4.2 Article

A survey of police officers encounters with sober, alcohol- and drug-intoxicated suspects in Sweden

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 523-544

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2021.1929978

Keywords

Police practice; survey; intoxicated; alcohol; suspects

Funding

  1. Vetenskapsradet [2014-6693]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alcohol-related crimes are common globally, with a high prevalence of intoxicated suspects in Sweden according to a survey of police officers. The study found differences in procedures among police departments for handling intoxicated suspects, highlighting the need for (inter)national guidelines and further scientific research on the effects of alcohol on suspects' memory and decision-making.
Alcohol-related crimes are very common globally, including in Scandinavia. Despite this, no survey to date has examined the prevalence of alcohol- and drug-intoxicated suspects in Sweden specifically, or which procedures police use when interacting with this suspect group. Given the current lack of (inter)national policy guidelines on how to interrogate intoxicated persons, it is important to examine law enforcement's contact with this potentially vulnerable group in different contexts. This was the aim of the present study. Data were collected via an online survey sent out to Swedish police investigators and 133 officers responded in total. A large majority (87%) of responses indicated that it was common or very common to encounter intoxicated suspects, but findings also suggest that police departments differ in their procedures for when and how to conduct investigations and interviews involving drunk suspects. Our findings support the need for (inter)national guidelines on how to interview intoxicated suspects and the need for more scientific studies on how alcohol affects suspect's memory and decision making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available