4.5 Article

Peopling the Environmental State: River Restoration and State Power

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2021.1913089

Keywords

dam removal; environmental governance; political ecology; river restoration; state theory

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS-1263519]
  2. Nelson A. Rockefeller Center for Public Policy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our research focuses on dam removal in New England as a way to analyze state actors' abilities to govern environmental processes. We found that some state agencies in New England have been more successful at adopting new roles and managing environmental conflicts related to dam removal and restoration efforts. This highlights the uneven distribution of state power within environmental governance arrangements and the potential for state-led environmental interventions to contribute to progressive political commitments.
Dam removal in the United States is an increasingly attractive option for advocates of river restoration. We argue that dam removal in New England (United States) is a useful lens for examining state actors' capabilities to govern environmental processes. Our analytical framework builds off and integrates strategic-relational approaches (SRAs) to state power and those approaches more concerned with peopling the state through state agents' everyday encounters with civil society. The complex suite of issues-ranging from safety and the environmental benefits of free-flowing rivers to historical preservation and cultural heritage- characterizing dam removal and similar restoration efforts challenge state agents to become more multidimensional in environmental governance. Our research reveals that some state agencies in New England have been more effective than others at adopting these novel roles and managing environmental conflicts. Our research also suggests we view the state as a complex collective of relations and actors that exerts power over nature-society relations in strategic and often contradictory ways. Our empirical findings, coupled to more nuanced theories of state-nature relations, direct attention to how state power is unevenly distributed within environmental governance arrangements. These findings also suggest that consideration of environmental interventions directed by state agents has the potential to contribute to a progressive and ecologically mindful set of political commitments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available