Journal
PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 219-228Publisher
EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/prj0000480
Keywords
COVID-19; mental health services; burnout; job-demands resource model; moderated mediation
Categories
Funding
- state Division of Mental Health and Addictions (DMHA) [0000000000000 000000039342]
- National Institute of Drug Abuse [R01DA049891]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that work changes during the COVID-19 pandemic have a significant indirect effect on burnout and subsequent turnover intentions among mental health service providers. The impact of work changes on burnout varied depending on the levels of job resources, with burnout being relatively low only when work changes were low and job resources were high. Organizations should aim to limit work changes to minimize burnout among service providers.
Objective: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has drastically impacted the provision of mental health services. Changes required of providers were substantial and could lead to increased burnout and, subsequently, increased turnover intentions. This study examined burnout experienced by mental health services providers in the context of COVID-19 and through the lens of the job demands-resources (JD-R) model. We examined the effects of work changes on burnout and subsequent turnover intentions, and how job and personal resources may have buffered the extent to which work changes due to COVID-19 impacted burnout. Methods: Service providers (n = 93) from six community mental health centers (CMHCs) in one Midwestern state in the United States completed surveys as part of service contracts to implement evidence-based practices. Path analysis tested the unconditional indirect relations between work changes and turnover intentions through burnout. Moderated mediation determined whether the indirect effect of work changes on turnover intentions via burnout varied in strength by job and personal resources. Results: Work changes had a significant indirect effect on turnover intentions through burnout ((beta) over cap = .140, 95% CI = .072, .217). This indirect effect varied as a function of two job resources, organizational trust and perceived organizational support. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Burnout was relatively low only when work changes were low and job resources levels high. When work changes were high, burnout was similarly high across levels of job resources. To minimize burnout, organizations should limit task, setting, and team-related work changes to the extent possible.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available