4.1 Article

Is Internationalization Beneficial to Innovation? Evidence from a Meta-analysis

Journal

MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 469-519

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11575-021-00451-0

Keywords

Internationalization; Innovation; Meta-analysis; Research design factors

Categories

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [71832012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper conducts a meta-analytical review to examine the impact of internationalization on innovation, with particular attention to the role of research design factors that may confound causal inferences. The analysis of 99 studies reveals that the effects of internationalization on innovation are diverse but generally positive, with effect sizes mostly small to moderate. Research design factors and country-context were found to influence the inferred magnitude of such effects.
This paper conducts a meta-analytical review to examine the impact of internationalization on innovation, with particular attention to the role of research design factors that may confound causal inferences. The existing literature is examined (1) to determine the average effect of internationalization on innovation and (2) to assess how variations in key aspects of research design has affected results. Analysis of 99 studies reveals that the effects of internationalization on innovation are diverse but are generally positive, albeit the effect sizes are mostly small to moderate. The inferred magnitude of such effects is influenced by research design factors and that country-context matters. The results suggest that internationalization measurements, data characteristics and statistical artifacts affect the variations in effect sizes. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges in future research on the internationalization-innovation nexus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available