4.5 Review

Adipokines and Migraine: A Systematic Review

Journal

HEADACHE
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages 622-644

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/head.12788

Keywords

adipokines; adiponectin; leptin; migraine; obesity

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [K23-NS078345]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundMigraine is comorbid with obesity. Recent research suggests an association between migraine and adipocytokines, proteins that are predominantly secreted from adipose tissue and which participate in energy homeostasis and inflammatory processes. ObjectivesIn this review, we first briefly discuss the association between migraine and obesity and the importance of adipose tissue as a neuroendocrine organ. We then present a systematic review of the extant literature evaluating circulating levels of adiponectin and leptin in those with migraine. MethodsA search of the PubMed database was conducted using the keywords migraine, adiponectin, and leptin. In addition reference lists of relevant articles were reviewed for possible inclusion. English language studies published between 2005 and 2015 evaluating circulating blood concentration of adiponectin or leptin in those with migraine were included. ConclusionsWhile the existing data are suggestive that adipokines may be associated with migraine, substantial study design differences and conflicting results limit definitive conclusions. Future research utilizing carefully considered designs and methodology is warranted. In particular careful and systematic characterization of pain states at the time of samples, as well as systematic consideration of demographic (eg, age, sex) and other vital covariates (eg, obesity status, lipids) are needed to determine if adipokines play a role in migraine pathophysiology and if any adipokine represents a viable, novel migraine biomarker, or drug target.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available