4.6 Article

Neural activity during provocation and aggressive responses in people from different social classes

Journal

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 7, Pages 5996-6010

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01925-y

Keywords

Aggression; Social class; fMRI; Point subtraction aggression paradigm; Provocation; Aggressive response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines neural activity during provocation and aggressive responses among individuals from different social classes. The findings suggest that low-class individuals display higher neural sensitivity during social provocation and aggressive responses than high-class individuals. The relationship between social class and aggression is moderated by the activity of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during provocation.
This study examined neural activity during provocation and aggressive responses among people from different social classes. Participants completed the Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Compared to high-class participants, low-class participants behaved more aggressively and exhibited greater activity in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) during provocation and greater activity in the insula and striatum during aggressive responses. The relationship between social class and aggression was moderated by OFC and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activity to provocation; that is, low-class participants behaved more aggressively than high-class participants when OFC/ACC activity was relatively low. However, this difference was not significant when OFC/ACC activity was higher. Our findings suggest that low-class individuals display higher neural sensitivity during social provocation and aggressive responses than high-class individuals. These results promote future research on the relationship between social class and aggression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available