4.5 Article

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Aggressive Nonmelanomatous Skin Cancer of the Head and Neck

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hed.24171

Keywords

Appropriateness Criteria; nonmelanomatous skin cancer; head neck; high risk; radiotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundAggressive nonmelanomatous skin cancer (NMSC) of the head and neck presents an increasingly common therapeutic challenge for which prospective clinical trials are lacking. MethodsThe American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. ResultsThe American College of Radiology Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer developed consensus recommendations for guiding management of aggressive NMSC. ConclusionMultidisciplinary assessment is vital to guiding the ideal use of surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy in this disease. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck38: 175-182, 2016

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available