4.3 Article

Academic mothers, professional identity and COVID-19: Feminist reflections on career cycles, progression and practice

Journal

GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 309-341

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12750

Keywords

academia; career progression; COVID-19; feminist theory; motherhood; professional identity

Funding

  1. Western Sydney University's Vice Chancellor's Gender Equity Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper uses auto-ethnographic narratives to explore the impact of COVID-19 on academic mothers' career cycles at an Australian university, aiming to explore alternative feminist models in Higher Education. The authors advocate for a re-centering of career cycle patterns and a call for enhancing institutional gender equality policies.
Based on a collection of auto-ethnographic narratives that reflect our experiences as academic mothers at an Australian university, this paper seeks to illustrate the impact of COVID-19 on our career cycles in order to explore alternative feminist models of progression and practice in Higher Education. Collectively, we span multiple disciplines, parenting profiles, and racial/ethnic backgrounds. Our narratives (initiated in 2019) explicate four focal points in our careers as a foundation for analyzing self-definitions of professional identity: pre- and post-maternity career break; and pre- and post-COVID-19 career. We have modeled this research on a collective feminist research practice that is generative and empowering in terms of self-reflective models of collaborative research. Considering this practice and these narratives, we argue for a de-centering of masculinized career cycle patterns and progression pathways both now and beyond COVID-19. This represents both a challenge to neo-liberal norms of academic productivity, as well as a call to radically enhance institutional gender equality policies and practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available