4.4 Article

Where is the social in the biopsychosocial model of suicide prevention?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 68, Issue 7, Pages 1403-1410

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00207640211027210

Keywords

Suicide; prevention; suicide prevention; biopsychosocial model

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has shown that risk and protective factors for suicidal behavior mainly focus on the individual, while suicide prevention strategies tend to follow individual models derived from risk factor studies. However, it is suggested that suicide prevention strategies should incorporate more relational, community, and social interventions to broaden their perspective.
Background: Each year, around 800,000 people die by suicide. The prevalence of suicidal behaviors is much higher when suicidal attempts and persistent self-injurious ideation are included. Therefore, suicide is a public health concern. Research has been sensitive to this problem, deepening the study of risk factors and the development of theoretical frameworks of suicidal behavior, with the aim of generating effective suicide prevention policies around the biopsychosocial model. Aim: We aimed to explore the role of relational, community, and social factors in current suicide prevention strategies. Method: Studies of risk and protective factors for suicidal behavior and the consequent development of theoretical frameworks were reviewed to verify if this knowledge was really used in suicide prevention policies. Results: Studies of risk and protective factors focus mainly on the individual, while theoretical frameworks emphasize the role of the relational, community, and social. Suicide prevention strategies more closely follow individual models derived from studies of risk factors. Conclusions: Suicide prevention strategies should broaden their individual narrative to include relational, community, and social interventions as anti-suicide measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available