Journal
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages 809-832Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2021.1904849
Keywords
resilience; resilience planning; U; S; cities
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Resilience plans in cities demonstrate a certain level of acknowledgement towards defining resilience, implementing strategies, involving the public, and addressing equity issues, although lacking operational measures. Cities incorporate various goals under the term resilience, indicating an understanding of urban system complexity but risking the ineffectiveness of those goals. Most resilience plans lean towards quickly restoring previous states rather than embracing the transformative potential towards a more equitable future.
Resilience is a framework that drives cities' responses to climate change, evidenced by the increasing number of resilience plans that cities have adopted. Resilience plans can offer insights on how cities conceptualize resilience. We undertake a content analysis of 38 resilience plans of US cities to understand how they define resilience, conceptualize goals and implementation strategies, involve the public in their formulation, and address equity issues. We find that equity manifests in explicit and implicit ways throughout the plans but is rarely operationalized. Cities gather many social, environmental, physical and economic goals under the term resilience, which may imply a recognition of the complexity of urban systems but renders those goals ineffective. The majority of resilience plans advocate a quick return to a previous state in the face of a disturbance, forgoing the opportunity to take on the more transformative potential of the term towards a more equitable future.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available