4.4 Article

The Relationship Between Social Media Use and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation

Journal

POLITICAL BEHAVIOR
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 781-804

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-021-09734-6

Keywords

Media effects; Social media; Conspiracy theory; Misinformation; Selective exposure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is an association between social media use and beliefs in conspiracy theories and misinformation, but this relationship is conditional on other individual-level predispositions. Findings from two studies show that individuals who rely on social media for news and use it frequently are more likely to believe in certain types of conspiracy theories and misinformation. However, this relationship is influenced by conspiracy thinking, the tendency to interpret significant events as products of conspiracies.
Numerous studies find associations between social media use and beliefs in conspiracy theories and misinformation. While such findings are often interpreted as evidence that social media causally promotes conspiracy beliefs, we theorize that this relationship is conditional on other individual-level predispositions. Across two studies, we examine the relationship between beliefs in conspiracy theories and media use, finding that individuals who get their news from social media and use social media frequently express more beliefs in some types of conspiracy theories and misinformation. However, we also find that these relationships are conditional on conspiracy thinking--the predisposition to interpret salient events as products of conspiracies--such that social media use becomes more strongly associated with conspiracy beliefs as conspiracy thinking intensifies. This pattern, which we observe across many beliefs from two studies, clarifies the relationship between social media use and beliefs in dubious ideas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available