4.7 Article

Sustainable development of carbon sinks? Lessons from three types of peatland partnerships in Indonesia

Journal

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 241-255

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2241

Keywords

carbon governance; climate change; green growth; low-carbon development; politics of scale; stakeholder engagement; transboundary partnerships; tropical peatlands

Funding

  1. Social Science Research Council, Ministry of Education, Singapore [MOE2016-SSRTG-068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conversion of peatlands for agriculture in Indonesia is a major contributor to global warming, with initiatives in Riau province failing to effectively retain soil-based carbon and mitigate carbon loss. Public, private, and civil society actors in partnership programmes have prioritized other agendas over environmental concerns, while under-utilizing ecologically meaningful governance scales.
Peatland conversion for agriculture is the leading cause of Indonesia's terrestrial carbon emissions that contribute substantially to global warming. Indonesia's peatlands contain 55-57 billion tonnes of carbon, the equivalent of almost 2 years of global carbon emissions at existing rates. This paper examines initiatives to retain soil-based carbon in Indonesia's province of Riau, where over half the surface area is composed of agriculturally productive peatlands. We qualitatively evaluate three types of partnership programmes (bilateral, co-governed and internationally funded local initiatives) in Riau aimed at the sustainable development of peatlands. The article finds that carbon loss is likely to persist in all case studies. Public, private and civil society actors in each partnership have exploited funding and political opportunities to advance agendas not directly related to the environment. The administrative category of the peatland hydrological unit as an ecologically meaningful scale of peatland governance is also under-utilised by the partnerships studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available