4.6 Article

The effect of spacing on incidental and deliberate learning of L2 collocations

Journal

SYSTEM
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102649

Keywords

Spacing; L2 collocations; Incidental learning; Deliberate learning; Form recall

Funding

  1. Research Centre for the Humanities, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of spacing on learning collocations and found that spaced practice had a significantly large effect on vocabulary gains in deliberate learning conditions, while massed practice was more effective in incidental learning situations. The research suggests implications for pedagogy and materials design, as well as offering suggestions for future studies.
Previous studies investigating the effects of spacing on vocabulary learning have primarily focused on single words. There is limited research on how distributed practice affects the learning of the phrasal lexicon. The present study addresses this gap by focusing on collocations. In a pretest-treatment-delayed-posttest design, two controlled quasi-experiments (N = 55 and N = 50) were conducted in order to evaluate two spacing schedules, spaced versus massed. The participants learned 25 adjective-noun collocations either incidentally (Experiment 1) or deliberately (Experiment 2). In each experiment, a control group was included. Participants' collocational gains were measured at a form-recall level of mastery three weeks after the treatment. Mixed-effects regression modelling results indicate that spacing had a significantly large effect on vocabulary gains in the deliberate learning condition and a small effect on gains in the incidental learning condition. Massing, on the other hand, appears to be more effective (with a medium effect) in incidental learning situations. Implications for pedagogy and materials design are followed by suggestions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available