Journal
DATA IN BRIEF
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107025
Keywords
Place-technology fit; Landscape-technology fit; Perceived landscape quality; Landscape meanings; Renewable energy meanings; Mixed renewable energy landscapes; Hybrid choice model; Integrated choice and latent variable model
Categories
Funding
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [407040_173808/1]
- Swiss Federal Office of the Environment (FOEN)
- Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE)
- Elektrizitatswerke des Kantons Zurich (EKZ)
- Swissgrid AG
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL)
- Binding Stiftung
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [407040_173808] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study presents preference data on mixed renewable energy infrastructure in landscapes based on a national representative Swiss online panel survey. The questionnaire included questions on landscapes, nature, and renewable energy infrastructure meanings, as well as evaluations of the fit between different Swiss landscapes and renewable energy infrastructure combinations. Through a stated choice experiment, respondents were presented with 15 consecutive choice tasks involving energy system transformation options and analyzed using a hybrid choice model.
We present stated preference data based on a national representative Swiss online panel survey related to preference of mixed renewable energy infrastructure in landscapes. Data were collected between November 2018 and March 2019 via an online questionnaire and yielded 1026 responses. The online questionnaire consisted of two main parts - (1) questions covering meanings related to landscapes, nature and renewable energy infrastructure and questions regarding the fit of landscape/renewable energy infrastructure (REI) combinations and (2) a stated choice experiment. While in the first part of the questionnaire we asked respondents about their personal connection to certain landscapes, to nature and to specific REI, we also asked them to evaluate the fitting of seven different Swiss landscapes (near natural alpine areas, northern alps, touristic alpine areas, agricultural plateau, urban plateau, Jura ridges, urban alpine valley) with five different REI (wind, PV ground/agricultural, PV ground/other, PV roof, power lines) combinations. In the second part of the questionnaire, the stated choice experiment confronted respondents with 15 consecutive choice tasks, with each task involving a choice between two energy system transformation options and an opt-out option (none). Each choice option (beside the opt-out option) included four unlabeled attributes (landscape, wind energy infrastructure, photovoltaic energy infrastructure, high voltage overhead power line infrastructure) with varying levels. Due to data cleaning procedures (item nonresponse) the number of responses used within hybrid choice modeling and analysis was n = 844 (12,660 choice observations). An analysis of the hybrid choice model and further insights are presented in the article gy infrastructure scenarios. A hybrid choice model. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available