4.7 Article

Eco-efficiency, eco-technology innovation and eco-well-being performance to improve global sustainable development

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106580

Keywords

Eco-efficiency; Eco-technology innovation; Eco-well-being performance; Sustainable development

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71901043]
  2. Chongqing Federation of Social Science [2020QNGL25]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has shown that countries with high levels of economic development perform better in terms of eco-efficiency, eco-technology innovation and eco-well-being performance, while the overall global 3E performance is relatively low.
In today's world, determining how to improve the quality of the economy, technology innovation and human well-being within resource and environmental limits is a global sustainable development goal. Thus, research on eco-efficiency (EE), eco-technology innovation (ETI) and eco-well-being performance (EWP) has great significance for improving the efficiency of converting ecological consumption into economic benefits, technological innovation and human well-being. This paper presents a two-stage Super-slack-based measure (SBM) model to examine the EE, ETI and EWP (3E) of 102 countries. The indicator system for the 3E network process is constructed by using inputs, intermediate products and outputs. The empirical results show that the highest 3E performers are Singapore, the United States and Iceland. The results also indicate that countries with high levels of economic development have much better EE, ETI and EWP levels than low-income countries. After comparing the values of the 3E in different countries with the global average, the results further show that overall global 3E performance is relatively low. These findings provide significant references to help governments generate different strategies for improving national 3E performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available