Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 440-452Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/01650254211022862
Keywords
Latent change score model; autoregressive latent trajectory model; latent growth model with structured residuals; asymptotic covariance; bias
Categories
Funding
- Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education [R305A110293, R324A150063]
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [T32 AA007477]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Hybrid autoregressive-latent growth models are powerful but may struggle to separate change processes during estimation, increasing the risk of producing biased results. Including more time points can improve process separability and model accuracy, but may not always be practical. The study found that the LGM-SR model is the most effective in terms of process separability and robustness to misspecification.
Hybrid autoregressive-latent growth structural equation models for longitudinal data represent a synthesis of the autoregressive and latent growth modeling frameworks. Although these models are conceptually powerful, in practice they may struggle to separate autoregressive and growth-related processes during estimation. This confounding of change processes may, in turn, increase the risk of the models producing deceptively compelling results (i.e., models that fit excellently by conventional standards despite highly biased parameter estimates). Including additional time points provides models with more raw information about change, which could help improve process separability and the accuracy of parameter estimates to a degree. This study thus used Monte Carlo simulation methods to examine associations between change process separability, the number of time points in a model, and the consequences of misspecification, across three prominent hybrid autoregressive-latent growth models: the Latent Change Score model (LCS), the Autoregressive Latent Trajectory Model (ALT), and the Latent Growth Model with Structured Residuals (LGM-SR). Results showed that including more time points increased process separability and robustness to misspecification in the LCS and ALT, but typically not at a rate that would be practically feasible for most developmental researchers. Alternatively, regardless of how many time points were in the model process separability was high in the LGM-SR, as was robustness to misspecification. Overall, results suggest that the LGM-SR is the most effective of the three hybrid autoregressive-latent growth models considered here.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available