4.4 Article

A four-dimensional framework for teacher assessment literacy in holistic competencies

Journal

ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 755-769

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1962806

Keywords

Generic skills; employability skills; 21(st) century skills; graduate attributes; soft skills

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [17200720]
  2. University Grants Committee of Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop a conceptualization of teachers' assessment literacy in holistic competencies, analyzing teachers' assessment literacy guided by four dimensions. The findings show that positive teacher-student relationships and subjectivity in assessment are particularly crucial in holistic competency assessment.
Given that existing research on teacher assessment literacy has focused on teachers' ability to evaluate students' academic achievements, this study aims to develop a conceptualization of teachers' assessment literacy in holistic competencies. Guided by four dimensions of teacher assessment literacy (knowledge, attitude, practice, socio-emotional management) identified from the existing literature, data collected from 18 individual interviews and one focus group interview with academics from four Hong Kong universities were analysed using the constant comparison method. The findings show that although the participants' conceptions concurred with the four dimensions in general, some aspects were particularly crucial in the context of holistic competency assessment: for example, positive teacher-student relationships and subjectivity in assessment. Findings from the study allowed us to revise the four-dimensional model in the context of holistic competency assessment with more elaborated forms of knowledge, attitude and capabilities that a holistic competency assessment literate teacher might be expected to possess and enact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available