4.7 Article

Love, life, and leftover ladies in urban China: Staying modernly single in patriarchal traditions

Journal

CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101626

Keywords

Marriage; Gender; Female education; Social norms

Categories

Funding

  1. Asia Research Center, Renmin University of China [19YYA04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The population in urban China is experiencing a trend of rising age at first marriage and declining marriage rates, particularly among college-educated professional women aged 27 or above. Traditional social norms, including patriarchy, still play a significant role in influencing women's likelihood of getting married. Higher education and career advancement tend to reduce the probability of marriage formation for women, with factors such as postgraduate degrees further oppressing this likelihood.
The population in urban China has shown rising age at first marriage and declining marriage rates, especially among college educated professional women who are in their late 20s or their 30s. We investigate the determinants of marriage formation for urban women aged 27 or above who tend to be termed leftover ladies. We estimate a recursive mixed-equation model to describe correlated profiles of career, education and marriage. Conventional social norms on gender, especially patriarchy, still prevail. Factors that are not favorable for a conventionally wifely role reduce women's likelihood of marriage. In particular, we reveal a marital collegediscount of college education. It reduces the probability of marriage by 2.88%-3.6% and a postgraduate degree further oppresses it by 8.4%-10.4%. Favorable characteristics such as facial attractiveness only raises the likelihood of marriage formation for non-college educated women, while pushing up non-marriage probabilities for women with at least college degrees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available