Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Religion, cognitive style, and rational thinking
Jonathan Baron
CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES (2020)
The Negative Intelligence-Religiosity Relation: New and Confirming Evidence
Miron Zuckerman et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN (2020)
Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking
Michael V. Bronstein et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION (2019)
Reception and willingness to share pseudo-profound bullshit and their relation to other epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive ability in Slovakia and Romania
Vladimira Cavojova et al.
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Colin F. Camerer et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)
COGNITIVE ABILITIES, ANALYTIC COGNITIVE STYLE AND OVERCONFIDENCE: A COMMENTARY ON DUTTLE (2016)
Michal Bialek et al.
BULLETIN OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH (2018)
Paranormal belief, thinking style preference and susceptibility to confirmatory conjunction errors
Paul Rogers et al.
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION (2018)
Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys: Hypothetical Judgment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas
Dries H. Bostyn et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Testing theories of secularization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia
Aiyana K. Willard et al.
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2017)
Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief
Clinton Sanchez et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence
Gordon Pennycook et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2017)
The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style
Hasan G. Bahcekapili et al.
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2017)
Analytic cognitive style and cognitive ability differentially predict religiosity and social conservatism
S. Adil Saribay et al.
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2017)
Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis
Gordon Pennycook et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
Analytic Thinking, Religion, and Prejudice: An Experimental Test of the Dual-Process Model of Mind
Onurcan Yilmaz et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION (2016)
The Intention-Behavior Gap
Paschal Sheeran et al.
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS (2016)
Better but still biased: Analytic cognitive style and belief bias
Dries Trippas et al.
THINKING & REASONING (2015)
Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)?
Jonathan Baron et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION (2015)
Adults Are Intuitive Mind-Body Dualists
Matthias Forstmann et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2015)
Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose
Marjaana Lindeman et al.
COGNITION (2015)
Morality and the religious mind: why theists and nontheists differ
Azim F. Shariff et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2014)
Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation
David Barron et al.
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2014)
Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection
Gordon Pennycook et al.
MEMORY & COGNITION (2014)
Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population
Emilio Lobato et al.
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2014)
The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values
Gordon Pennycook et al.
THINKING & REASONING (2014)
Explaining moral religions
Nicolas Baumard et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2013)
Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life's purpose
Aiyana K. Willard et al.
COGNITION (2013)
The Relation Between Intelligence and Religiosity: A Meta-Analysis and Some Proposed Explanations
Miron Zuckerman et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW (2013)
Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics
Gordon Pennycook et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2013)
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
Jonathan St B. T. Evans et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2013)
Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief
Will M. Gervais et al.
SCIENCE (2012)
What's in a Term? Paranormal, Superstitious, Magical and Supernatural Beliefs by Any Other Name Would Mean the Same
Marjaana Lindeman et al.
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY (2012)
Divine Intuition: Cognitive Style Influences Belief in God
Amitai Shenhav et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2012)
Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief
Gordon Pennycook et al.
COGNITION (2012)
Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging: The Big Four Religious Dimensions and Cultural Variation
Vassilis Saroglou
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY (2011)
Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals Into Moral Communities
Jesse Graham et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW (2010)
Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY (2008)
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Nicholas Epley et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2007)
Cognitive reflection and decision making
S Frederick
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES (2005)
Are children intuitive theists? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature
D Kelemen
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2004)
The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity
JM Bering et al.
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2004)
Believe it or not: Religious and other paranormal beliefs in the United States
TW Rice
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION (2003)
Probability misjudgment, cognitive ability, and belief in the paranormal
J Musch et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (2002)
Share Paper
