4.6 Article

Too similar to combine? On negative weights in forecast combination

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 18-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.08.002

Keywords

Forecast combination; Optimal weights; Negative weight; Trimming; Shrinkage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a comprehensive investigation into the emergence of negative weights when combining forecasts. The study challenges the usual practice of ignoring or trimming negative weights, suggesting that trimming can improve the combined forecast. A proposed optimal trimming threshold is introduced to enhance forecasting performance, and its effectiveness is demonstrated through simulations and empirical examples.
This paper provides the first thorough investigation of the negative weights that can emerge when combining forecasts. The usual practice in the literature is to consider only convex combinations and ignore or trim negative weights, i.e., set them to zero. This default strategy has its merits, but it is not optimal. We study the problem from various angles, and the main conclusion is that negative weights emerge when highly correlated forecasts with similar variances are combined. In this situation, the estimated weights have large variances, and trimming reduces the variance of the weights and improves the combined forecast. The threshold of zero is arbitrary and can be improved. We propose an optimal trimming threshold, i.e., an additional tuning parameter to improve forecasting performance. The effects of optimal trimming are demonstrated in simulations. In the empirical example using the European Central Bank Survey of Professional Forecasters, we find that the new strategy performs exceptionally well and can deliver improvements of more than 10% for inflation, up to 20% for GDP growth, and more than 20% for unemployment forecasts relative to the equal-weight benchmark.(c) 2021 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available