4.6 Article

Assessing the effects of a large temporary energy savings program: Evidence from a developing country

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102529

Keywords

Energy efficiency; Energy paradox; Energy efficiency gap; Electricity demand; Household appliance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of a large temporary energy-savings program on the valuation of energy efficiency by Brazilian households and the counterfactual energy savings. The program only increases the valuations of households facing incentives in the form of an energy consumption quota and the effects of the program on valuations are temporary, reverting to prior levels after the program ends. The findings also show significant counterfactual energy savings related to the purchase of new refrigerators.
We examine the effects of a large temporary energy-savings program on the valuation of energy efficiency by Brazilian households, as well as its counterfactual energy savings. Using a representative sample of Brazilian households, we specify and estimate a structural model of appliance choice and document that (i) the program only increases the valuations of households facing incentives in the form of an energy consumption quota introduced by the program; (ii) the effect of incentives dominates other components of the energy efficiency gap; (iii) the effect of the program on valuations is temporary, with these essentially reverting to prior levels after the end of the program; (iv) heterogeneity in valuations is prevalent; (v) focusing only on the purchase of new refrigerators, the counterfactual energy savings are non-trivial, being equivalent to the yearly electricity consumption of a city with 1.15 mn inhabitants. The findings suggest that short-lived reactions to temporary programs on the extensive margin are non-trivial and have log-run implications via the purchase of durables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available