4.6 Article

Short of drugs? Call upon operations and supply chain management

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2021-0175

Keywords

Drug shortages; Supply chain risk management; Interventions; Review; COVID-19

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway (RCN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper argues that OSCM could help address the worsening drug shortage problem in high-income countries. However, there is little academic research and no fundamental agreement among stakeholders about the causes of shortages. The authors discuss three pathways for impactful research on drug shortages that OSCM could contribute to.
Purpose This impact pathways paper argues that operations and supply chain management (OSCM) could help address the worsening drug shortage problem in high-income countries. This significant societal problem poses difficult challenges to stakeholders given the complex and dynamic nature of drug supply chains. OSCM scholars are well positioned to provide answers, introducing new research directions for OSCM in the process. Design/methodology/approach To substantiate this, the authors carried out a review of stakeholder reports from six European countries and the academic literature. Findings There is little academic research and no fundamental agreement among stakeholders about causes of shortages. Stakeholders have suggested many government measures, but little evidence exists on their comparative cost-effectiveness. Originality/value The authors discuss three pathways of impactful research on drug shortages to which OSCM could contribute: (1) Developing an evidence-based system view of drug shortages; (2) Studying the comparative cost-effectiveness of key government interventions; (3) Bringing supply chain risk management into the government and economics perspectives and vice versa. Our study provides a baseline for future COVID-19-related research on this topic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available