4.5 Article

Integrating Qualitative Methods and Open Science: Five Principles for More Trustworthy Research

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

An Argument for Bad Psychology: Disciplinary Disruption, Public Engagement, and Social Transformation

Patrick R. Grzanka et al.

Summary: This article explores how psychology's disciplinary norms may hinder the development of public psychology, and suggests that psychology should be more open to ideas, perspectives, and methods that challenge the status quo. The core values of psychology may impede efforts to promote public psychology, particularly when engaging with communities affected by historical, structural inequalities. The discipline's aspirations for publicly engaged science can be undermined by its norms, including methodological and ethical standards that maintain scientific integrity and define the boundaries of the field.

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2021)

Article Education & Educational Research

Epistemic Exclusion: Scholar(ly) Devaluation That Marginalizes Faculty of Color

Isis H. Settles et al.

Summary: Faculty of color face numerous challenges in academia, one of which is epistemic exclusion. They cope with this exclusion by being assertive and seeking validation and support outside the institution, but still experience negative consequences. Additionally, there is variability in how experiences of epistemic exclusion are reported based on race, gender, nationality, and discipline.

JOURNAL OF DIVERSITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION (2021)

Article Communication

An Agenda for Open Science in Communication

Tobias Dienlin et al.

Summary: The replication crisis in social sciences has called for open science practices to increase the reliability and reproducibility of findings, and communication research faces similar challenges. Proposed agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication includes publishing materials, data, and code, preregistering studies, conducting replications, fostering open science skills, implementing Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines, and incentivizing open science practices. Despite focusing on quantitative research, reflections on open science practices relevant to qualitative research are also included, along with discussing potential objections and concerns.

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION (2021)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Of wine and whiteboards: Enacting feminist reflexivity in collaborative research

Jasmine R. Linabary et al.

Summary: This article introduces the concept of collaborative feminist reflexivity, a form of reflexivity grounded in feminist epistemological and ethical commitments, engaged throughout the research process. By critically analyzing their own reflexive practices in the context of a multi-method study, the authors seek to identify specific practices for research teams and explore the potentials and limitations of enacting feminist reflexivity.

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (2021)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Academic Collaboration Rates and Citation Associations Vary Substantially Between Countries and Fields

Mike Thelwall et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2020)

Letter Behavioral Sciences

Is Preregistration Worthwhile?

Aba Szollosi et al.

TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2020)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science

Dietmar Wolfram et al.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2020)

Article Political Science

Why Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers? Evidence from a Field Experiment

Adam Seth Levine

PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS (2020)

Article Communication

Open Communication Science: A Primer on Why and Some Recommendations for How

Jr Neil A. Lewis

COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES (2020)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

Christopher Allen et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models

Luc Rocher et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2019)

Editorial Material Behavioral Sciences

N-Best Evaluation for Academic Hiring and Promotion

Michael C. Frank

TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2019)

Review Psychology

Psychology's Renaissance

Leif D. Nelson et al.

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 69 (2018)

Article Psychology

The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology Through a Distributed Collaborative Network

Hannah Moshontz et al.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)

Article Communication

#Communication So White

Paula Chakravartty et al.

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION (2018)

Article Economics

Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research

Garret Christensen et al.

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE (2018)

Article Psychology

Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results

R. Silberzahn et al.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)

Article Psychology

Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing

Michelle N. Meyer

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)

Article Engineering, Environmental

Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition

Marc A. Edwards et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE (2017)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

Mallory C. Kidwell et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)

Review Computer Science, Information Systems

Bias in peer review

Carole J. Lee et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Low Hopes, High Expectations: Expectancy Effects and the Replicability of Behavioral Experiments

Olivier Klein et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)

Article Humanities, Multidisciplinary

Editing Academic Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Maximizing Impact for Effort

Louise Edwards

JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING (2012)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability

Brian A. Nosek et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)

Article Sociology

Living with the h-index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy

Roger Burrows

SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW (2012)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Qualitative Quality: Eight Big-Tent Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research

Sarah J. Tracy

QUALITATIVE INQUIRY (2010)