4.4 Article

Carbohydrate-rich breakfast attenuates glycaemic, insulinaemic and ghrelin response to ad libitum lunch relative to morning fasting in lean adults

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages 98-107

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515001506

Keywords

Breakfast skipping; Appetite hormones; Insulin sensitivity; Second-meal effect; Energy intake

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H008322/1]
  2. University of Bath
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H008322/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/H008322/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/K00414X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breakfast omission is associated with obesity and CVD/diabetes, but the acute effects of extended morning fasting upon subsequent energy intake and metabolic/hormonal responses have received less attention. In a randomised cross-over design, thirty-five lean men (n 14) and women (n 21) extended their overnight fast or ingested a typical carbohydrate-rich breakfast in quantities relative to RMR (i.e. 1963 (SD 238)kJ), before an ad libitum lunch 3 h later. Blood samples were obtained hourly throughout the day until 3 h post-lunch, with subjective appetite measures assessed. Lunch intake was greater following extended fasting (640 (SD 1042) kJ, P<0.01) but incompletely compensated for the omitted breakfast, with total intake lower than the breakfast trial (3887 (SD 1326) v. 5213 (SD 1590) kJ, P<0.01). Systemic concentrations of peptide tyrosine-tyrosine and leptin were greater during the afternoon following breakfast (both P<0.05) but neither acylated/total ghrelin concentrations were suppressed by the ad libitum lunch in the breakfast trial, remaining greater than the morning fasting trial throughout the afternoon (all P<0.05). Insulin concentrations were greater during the afternoon in the morning fasting trial (all P<0.01). There were no differences between trials in subjective appetite during the afternoon. In conclusion, morning fasting caused incomplete energy compensation at an ad libitum lunch. Breakfast increased some anorectic hormones during the afternoon but paradoxically abolished ghrelin suppression by the second meal. Extending morning fasting until lunch altered subsequent metabolic and hormonal responses but without greater appetite during the afternoon. The present study clarifies the impact of acute breakfast omission and adds novel insights into second-meal metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available