4.5 Article

A meta-analysis integrating 20 years of workplace incivility research: Antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 497-523

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/job.2568

Keywords

meta-analysis; mistreatment; workplace incivility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the factors contributing to workplace incivility and its outcomes through a comprehensive meta-analysis, examining various moderators and comparing the impact of experienced incivility with more intense forms of workplace mistreatment. The findings enhance understanding of the nomological net of workplace incivility in comparison with other forms of mistreatment.
In this study, we propose and examine an integrative framework to investigate factors contributing to the experience of workplace incivility (including victim demography, dispositional individual differences, and environmental factors); the affective, health-related, social exchange-based, and behavioral outcomes associated with experienced incivility; and boundary conditions for their relationships. To this end, we conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis on the antecedents and consequences of experienced workplace incivility based on 253 statistically independent samples from 219 primary studies and examine several moderators such as differences in time-related research design (cross-sectional vs. time-lagged), incivility instigator source, and occupation. Further, by integrating meta-analytic effect sizes from the current study with effect sizes from existing meta-analyses, we also investigate the extent to which the impact of experienced incivility on outcomes differs from that of higher intensity forms of workplace mistreatment inclusive of bullying, abusive supervision, and sexual harassment, thereby enhancing understanding regarding the nomological net of experienced incivility in comparison with more intense forms of workplace mistreatment. We discuss the implications of these findings along with study limitations and future directions for incivility scholarship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available