4.4 Review

What do people mean when they talk about mindfulness?

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102085

Keywords

Mindfulness; Measurement; Emotion regulation; Stress reduction; Wisdom; Acceptance; Awareness

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [435-2014-0685]
  2. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation [ER16-12-169]
  3. Templeton Pathways to Character Award
  4. Oxford Mindfulness Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Psychological theories see mindfulness as a form of awareness that helps individuals accept the presence of stressful thoughts and emotions, allowing for engaged exploration and identification of adaptive responses. Critics argue that the popularization of mindfulness has led to misunderstandings among lay people, who often misconstrue acceptance as a passive endorsement of experiences, hindering effective problem-solving. Research findings show that while experts and clinical samples demonstrate convergence between awareness and acceptance, lay people's understanding of mindfulness lacks such associations.
Psychological theories cast mindfulness as a form of awareness in which accepting the presence of stressful thoughts and feelings facilitates engaged exploration and identification of adaptive responses. Critics of mindfulness' popularization suggest that lay people misconstrue acceptance as a passive endorsement of experience, undermining engaged problem-solving. To evaluate this criticism, we traced the contemporary semantic meaning of mindfulness in three of the most extensive linguistic corpora of English language and found that general public's depictions of mindfulness highlight engagement-related processes. We further analyzed the nomological network of mindfulness. While mindfulness theories suggest a general convergence of facets representing awareness and acceptance, in a meta-analysis (k = 145; N = 41,966) of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire only expert-and clinical samples reported convergence, whereas lay people showed absent or even antagonistic associations. Further, contrary to the synergistic model of awareness and acceptance contributing to greater engagement, empirical probes of two lay samples (N-total = 406) show that acceptance is either unrelated or inversely related to markers of engagement. To overcome resulting conceptual and methodological challenges, we highlight the need for a contextualized mindfulness framework whereby acceptance enables the process of engaging with life's challenges rather than avoiding them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available