4.4 Article

Emotional Labor Profiles Among Teachers: Associations With Positive Affective, Motivational, and Well-Being Factors

Journal

JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages 1227-1243

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/edu0000654

Keywords

teachers; emotional labor; positive indicators; latent profile analysis

Funding

  1. Croatian Science Foundation [UIP-11-2013-5065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on emotional labor among teachers found that those who primarily engage in deep acting show more adaptive outcomes, while those who hide their feelings exhibit lower levels of positive affect, self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction, regardless of their level of deep acting.
Research indicates that teachers perform emotional labor daily. However, previous studies have mostly used a variable-centered approach that examines the associations of emotional labor strategies with particular outcome variables. This approach did not consider the possibility that teachers use different emotional labor strategies simultaneously. Therefore, in this study we took a person-centered approach and explored the emotional labor profiles in a large sample of Croatian teachers (N = 2,002) employed across educational levels (i.e., elementary, middle, and high school levels) by using latent profile analysis. In addition, we examined differences among profiles regarding teachers' positive affect, self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Results indicated the existence of six emotional labor profiles that were characterized by different combinations of deep acting, hiding feelings, and faking emotions. Profiles of teachers who dominantly rely on deep acting had the most adaptive patterns of analyzed outcomes, whereas profiles of teachers who reported higher levels of hiding feelings, regardless the level of deep acting, exhibited less desirable levels of positive affect, self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available