Cycles of Conflict, a Century of Continuity: The Impact of Persistent Place-Based Political Logics on Social Movement Strategy1

The women's liberation movement hotly debated both the cause of women's oppression and the best approach to changing it. When treated as a moment within 1960s political polarization, these debates can seem esoteric and arbitrary. When examined across the longue duree, the debates prove to reflect complex and stable differences in interpretation that were tied to place more than to the political moment. Using a combination of network analysis, computational text analysis, and qualitative interpretation, the author examines women's movement discourses across the first and second waves of activism and between two sites, New York City and Chicago. Place, she finds, serves to capture differences in political logics that generate durable differences within movement discourse.

Automated summary

The debates within the women's liberation movement regarding the cause of women's oppression and the best approach to change it are complex and stable differences in interpretation, more influenced by place than by political moment. Through network analysis, computational text analysis, and qualitative interpretation, the author explores how political logics in different locations contribute to durable differences within movement discourse.