4.4 Article

What Is Your Estimand? Defining the Target Quantity Connects Statistical Evidence to Theory

Journal

AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages 532-565

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00031224211004187

Keywords

social statistics; research design; descriptive inference; causal inference; estimands

Categories

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health [P2CHD047879]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article emphasizes the importance of specifying estimands in quantitative studies, advocating for setting theoretical estimands, linking to empirical estimands, and learning from data to connect statistical evidence to theory. This approach expands the space of theoretical questions, clarifies the significance of evidence, and unlocks new tools for estimation.
We make only one point in this article. Every quantitative study must be able to answer the question: what is your estimand? The estimand is the target quantity-the purpose of the statistical analysis. Much attention is already placed on how to do estimation; a similar degree of care should be given to defining the thing we are estimating. We advocate that authors state the central quantity of each analysis-the theoretical estimand-in precise terms that exist outside of any statistical model. In our framework, researchers do three things: (1) set a theoretical estimand, clearly connecting this quantity to theory; (2) link to an empirical estimand, which is informative about the theoretical estimand under some identification assumptions; and (3) learn from data. Adding precise estimands to research practice expands the space of theoretical questions, clarifies how evidence can speak to those questions, and unlocks new tools for estimation. By grounding all three steps in a precise statement of the target quantity, our framework connects statistical evidence to theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available