4.6 Article

The COVID-19 crisis and Amazonia's indigenous people: Implications for conservation and global health

Journal

WORLD DEVELOPMENT
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105533

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The weakening environmental policies in the Brazilian Amazon are elevating the risk of additional zoonotic spillover events, while indigenous land rights are under attack. Indigenous territories exhibit lower rates of forest conversion and degradation, promoting public health and sustaining ecosystem services, but are threatened by illegal land grabbing and mining.
Ecosystem health and zoonotic diseases are closely interwoven. Even as we grapple with the SARSCoronavirus-2 pandemic, which may have its origins in wildlife, weakening environmental policies in the Brazilian Amazon are elevating the risk of additional zoonotic spillover events. We examine the links between deforestation and disease emergence in the Amazon, as illustrated by outbreaks of yellow fever virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, and Oropouche virus. It has been well established that in Brazil, indigenous territories exhibit lower rates of forest conversion and degradation than in areas designated for sustainable use. In this way, Amazonia's indigenous tribes promote public health while sustaining ecosystem services. However, indigenous land rights are under attack due to current policies enabling illegal land grabbing, mining and logging. Further adding to the existential struggle of indigenous tribes, malaria and SARS-Coronavirus-2 are wreaking havoc on these vulnerable populations. There is a critical need for protection of indigenous people's rights and health, as well as a sustained effort to support the study of mechanisms underlying anthropogenic land use change and zoonotic disease risk. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available