4.7 Article

The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science

Journal

RESEARCH POLICY
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104226

Keywords

Innovation; Research productivity; Open science; Intellectual property; Patents; Research incentives; Public-private partnerships; Networks

Categories

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1183051]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1183051] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses the decline in the innovation system's ability to create wealth and attain social benefit, attributing it to the increasing complexity of science, a mismatch of incentives, and a balkanization of knowledge. By establishing open science partnerships, efficiency of the innovation system can be improved.
There is growing concern that the innovation system?s ability to create wealth and attain social benefit is declining in effectiveness. This article explores the reasons for this decline and suggests a structure, the open science partnership, as one mechanism through which to slow down or reverse this decline. The article examines the empirical literature of the last century to document the decline. This literature suggests that the cost of research and innovation is increasing exponentially, that researcher productivity is declining, and, third, that these two phenomea have led to an overall flat or declining level of innovation productivity. The article then turns to three explanations for the decline ? the growing complexity of science, a mismatch of incentives, and a balkanization of knowledge. Finally, the article explores the role that open science partnerships ? public-private partnerships based on open access publications, open data and materials, and the avoidance of restrictive forms of intellectual property ? can play in increasing the efficiency of the innovation system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available