4.7 Article

Does greater diversification increase individual productivity? The moderating effect of attention allocation

Journal

RESEARCH POLICY
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104256

Keywords

Attention; Cognition; Collaboration; Diversification; Research productivity

Categories

Funding

  1. British Academy/Leverhulme Small Research Grant [SRG1920\100077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that there is a curvilinear relationship between diversification of knowledge and collaborators on individual productivity. Moderate diversification is optimal when cognitive attention is low, while high diversification is more beneficial when cognitive attention is high. A combination of moderate collaborator diversification and high collaborative attention is optimal for research productivity.
Despite the consensus on the ?double-edged sword? effect of diversification (of knowledge and collaborators) on individual performance, little is known about the contingencies that affect the relationship between diversification and individual productivity. Drawing on the attention-based view, we theorize the moderating role of attention allocation to advance our understanding of the curvilinear relationship between diversification (of knowledge and collaborators) and individual productivity. Relevant hypotheses are tested using a longitudinal sample of more than 25,000 individual scholars. Our analysis reveals that although a moderate level of knowledge diversification is optimal for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is low, a high level of knowledge diversification is more beneficial for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is high. Furthermore, we show that a moderate level of collaborator diversification, coupled with a high level of collaborative attention, is optimal for research productivity. Our study provides important implications for highly skilled and creative individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available