4.7 Article

Manager or Politician? Effects of CEO Pay on the Performance of State-Controlled Chinese Listed Firms

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 1160-1187

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/01492063211015301

Keywords

CEO compensation; SOE performance; agency theory; principal-principal conflicts; business group; China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that CEO pay in Chinese state-owned enterprises is related to the return on assets and job creation, with the relationship being influenced by factors such as hierarchical levels within business groups, political competition, and non-state second-largest shareholders.
We examine the effects of chief executive officer (CEO) pay on two performance outcomes for central government-controlled Chinese listed firms: financial performance (return on assets, which is associated with the interests of all shareholders) and political performance (job creation, which reflects a primary objective of the controlling owner, the state). We posit that China's mixed economy places state-owned enterprise (SOE) executives on dual career tracks-business and politics-and their career interests are differentially aligned with the divergent interests of minority shareholders and the state, respectively, depending on the firm's position in the corresponding enterprise group. Based on a sample of 2,145 firm-year observations from 230 state-controlled Chinese listed firms between 2004 and 2014, we find that higher CEO pay leads to a higher return on assets. This relationship is strengthened when there are more hierarchical layers above the focal firm in the business group, when there is more potential political competition from other group affiliates, and when there is a nonstate second-largest shareholder. Higher CEO pay also leads to greater job creation, but this relationship is weakened by political competition and nonstate second-largest shareholder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available