4.6 Article

Mickey D's Has More Street Cred Than McDonald's: Consumer Brand Nickname Use Signals Information Authenticity

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARKETING
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages 58-73

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022242921996277

Keywords

brand nickname; information authenticity; inferred brand attachment; user-generated content

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research demonstrates that the use of brand nicknames in user-generated content enhances perceived information authenticity and leads to positive downstream consequences. However, the effect is attenuated when brand nicknames are used in firm-generated content.
Consumers often observe how other consumers interact with brands to inform their own brand judgments. This research demonstrates that brand relationship quality-indicating cues, such as brand nicknames (e.g., Mickey D's for McDonald's, Wally World for Walmart), enhance perceived information authenticity in online communication. An analysis of historical Twitter data followed by six experiments (using both real and fictitious brands across different online platforms [e.g., online reviews, social media posts]) show that brand nickname use in user-generated content signals a writer's relationship quality with the target brand from the reader's perspective, which the authors term inferred brand attachment. The authors demonstrate that inferred brand attachment boosts perceived information authenticity and leads to positive downstream consequences, such as purchase willingness and information sharing. The authors also find that this effect is attenuated when brand nicknames are used in firm-generated content. How consumers' relationships with brands are portrayed and perceived in a social context (e.g., via brand nickname use) serves as a novel context to examine user-generated content and provides valuable managerial insight regarding how to leverage consumers' brand attachment cues in brand strategy and online information management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available