4.6 Article

Increasing Consumers' Purchase Intentions Toward Fair-Trade Products Through Partitioned Pricing

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 181, Issue 4, Pages 1015-1040

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04938-6

Keywords

Fair-trade products; Partitioned pricing; Fairness; Purchase intention; Attitude-behavior gap; Price premium

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. ESCP Business School

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Partitioned pricing, which separates fair-trade as a distinct price component, increases consumers' purchase intentions towards fair-trade products, especially when accompanied by a verbal justification. This strategy shows a significant increase in purchases without specific boundary conditions, providing an opportunity to enhance the market share of fair-trade products.
Selling fair-trade products can be problematic because of their higher price when compared with conventional alternatives. We propose that one way to solve this problem is to make consumers aware of the benefits of fair-trade. To this end, we perform three experimental studies to show that partitioned pricing (PP), which explicitly displays fair-trade as a separate price component, increases consumers' purchase intention toward the fair-trade product. This effect can be explained by increased perceptions of price fairness, which itself is mediated through transparency (but only if an additional verbal justification of the fair-trade price component is present). In the absence of such a verbal justification, recalled prices instead of transparency explain the positive effect of PP on consumers' purchase intentions. Interestingly, boundary conditions of this effect barely exist. Our incentive-aligned study illustrates that PP is associated with a 20% increase in purchases of fair-trade products. The results demonstrate an opportunity to increase the market share of fair-trade products, which increases social welfare and sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available