4.6 Article

UNPACKING POLITICAL IDEOLOGY: CEO SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IDEOLOGIES, STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES, AND CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Journal

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 1213-1235

Publisher

ACAD MANAGEMENT
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2019.1228

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of social and economic conservatism on corporate entrepreneurship, finding that they have opposing effects through different strategic decision-making processes. The results underscore the importance of distinguishing between social and economic ideologies and how executive political ideology shapes strategic behaviors.
We integrate political psychology and upper echelons research to introduce an alternative conceptualization of executive political ideology by separating the two distinct ideologies: social and economic. We theorize and test how the two ideologies exert distinct effects on a critical strategic outcome: corporate entrepreneurship. We examine this contention in Iran, a political context that sharply deviates from the exclusively studied U.S. context. We find that social and economic conservatism exert opposing effects on corporate entrepreneurship through distinct strategic decision-making processes; CEO social conservatism positively affects corporate entrepreneurship by promoting intuitive strategic decision-making, whereas CEO economic conservatism negatively affects corporate entrepreneurship by impairing cooperative strategic decision-making. These results highlight the need to separate social and economic ideologies, especially in non-U.S. contexts, and inform the underlying strategic decision-making processes through which executive ideology shapes strategic behaviors. The promising results also underscore the importance of examining the strategic implications of executive political ideology in diverse political contexts that differ from the U.S. context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available