4.7 Article

Effects of Social Media Use on Psychological Well-Being: A Mediated Model

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678766

Keywords

smartphone addiction; social isolation; bonding social capital; bridging social capital; phubbing; social media use

Funding

  1. National Statistics Research Project of China [2016LY96]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on psychological well-being, finding an overall positive indirect effect primarily due to the positive influence of social capital. By considering mediators such as social capital types, social isolation, and smartphone addiction, the study provides a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon and reconciles inconsistencies in the literature.
The growth in social media use has given rise to concerns about the impacts it may have on users' psychological well-being. This paper's main objective is to shed light on the effect of social media use on psychological well-being. Building on contributions from various fields in the literature, it provides a more comprehensive study of the phenomenon by considering a set of mediators, including social capital types (i.e., bonding social capital and bridging social capital), social isolation, and smartphone addiction. The paper includes a quantitative study of 940 social media users from Mexico, using structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the proposed hypotheses. The findings point to an overall positive indirect impact of social media usage on psychological well-being, mainly due to the positive effect of bonding and bridging social capital. The empirical model's explanatory power is 45.1%. This paper provides empirical evidence and robust statistical analysis that demonstrates both positive and negative effects coexist, helping to reconcile the inconsistencies found so far in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available