4.7 Article

Plenty of analytical and semi-analytical wave solutions of shallow water beneath gravity

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 237-243

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.joes.2021.08.004

Keywords

Ill-posed Boussinesq dynamical wave; Analytical and semi-analytical simulations

Funding

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/52]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates novel soliton wave solutions of the nonlinear fractional ill-posed Boussinesq dynamic wave equation. The obtained solutions are explained in terms of their dynamic characteristics using the extended Riccati-expansion method, and their accuracy is verified by comparing them with semi-analytical solutions. The superiority of the extended Riccati-expansion method over the original method is discussed, and the solutions are further validated by submitting them back into the original model using Mathematica 12 software.
This article studies novel soliton wave solutions of the nonlinear fractional ill-posed Boussinesq (NLFIPB) dynamic wave equation by applying the extended Riccati-expansion (ERE) method. Jacques Hadamard has formulated the investigated model to figure out the dynamic characterizations of waves in shallow water under gravity. The obtained solutions are explained through some sketches in 2D and 3D and contour plots. At the same time, the results' accuracy is checked by comparing the obtained solutions with semianalytical solutions through the well-known Adomian decomposition (AD) method. The superiority of the ERE method over the original method is explained. All constructed solutions are checked by submitting them back into the original model through Mathematica 12 software. (c) 2021 Shanghai Jiaotong University. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available