4.3 Review

Patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab051

Keywords

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS); Health-related quality of life (HRQoL); High-quality cardiovascular care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In today's medical ecosystem, measuring the outcomes most important to patients is crucial. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) can serve as essential metrics for delivering high-quality cardiovascular care, but a lack of standardization makes it challenging to compare outcomes across treatments. By leveraging information technology, sophisticated data analysis using patient-derived data and randomization can generate impactful metrics to inform decision-making.
In today's medical ecosystem, it is vital to measure the outcomes that are most important to the patients. As such, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) can be an essential metric to deliver high-quality cardiovascular care, particularly in the subset of patients who remain disappointed with their outcomes. PROMS should be a reproducible and reflective report of what is fundamental to a patient over time and across treatments with proper standards in the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of the collected data. These reports can also be sensitive to changes, whether improvements or deteriorations in the quality of care and medical attitude, but a lack of standardization makes it difficult to draw robust conclusions and compare findings across treatments. As a research tool, PROMS can have a significant prognostic prominence, offering a powerful instrument of comparison between different treatment modalities. With the information technology (IT) abilities of today, we can leverage mobile tools and powerful computer systems to perform sophisticated data analysis using patient-derived data and randomization. This may eliminate guesswork and generate impactful metrics to better inform the decision-making process. PROMS analysed by proper standardized algorithms can avoid physician bias and be integrated into the hospital teamwork. Therefore, there is a strong need for integration of PROMS into the evaluation of cardiovascular interventions and procedures, and establishment of international standards in the analyses of patient-reported outcomes and quality of life data to address this need and develop therapeutic recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available