Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for first-degree relatives of patients with bicuspid aortic valve

Aims Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the commonest congenital heart valve malformation, and is associated with life-threatening complications. Given the high heritability index of BAV, many experts recommend echocardiography screening for first-degree relatives (FDRs) of an index case. Here, we aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of such cascade screening for BAV. Methods and results Using a decision-analytic model, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of echocardiographic screening for FDRs of a BAV index case. Data on BAV probabilities and complications among FDRs were derived from our institution's BAV familial cohort and from the literature on population-based BAV cohorts with long-term follow-up. Health gain was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost inputs were based on list prices and literature data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty in the model's variables. Screening of FDRs was found to be the dominant strategy, being more effective and less costly than no screening, with savings of Euro644 and gains of 0.3 QALY. Results were sensitive throughout the range of the main model's variables, including the full range of reported BAV rates among FDRs across the literature. A gradual decrease of the incremental effect was found with the increase in screening age. Conclusion This economic evaluation model found that echocardiographic screening of FDRs of a BAV index case is not only clinically important but also cost-effective and cost-saving. Sensitivity analysis supported the model's robustness, suggesting its generalization.

Automated summary

The study found that echocardiographic screening for first-degree relatives of BAV index cases is not only clinically important but also cost-effective and cost-saving. Sensitivity analysis supported the model's robustness, suggesting its generalization.