4.8 Article

Gravitational search algorithm based strategy for combinatorial t-way test suite generation

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.06.020

Keywords

Combinatorial testing; T-way test suites; Interaction testing; Metaheuristic; Gravitational search algorithm

Funding

  1. Fun-damental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) [FRGS/1/2018/ICT01/UNIMAP/02/1]
  2. Ministry of Educa-tion Malaysia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new t-way strategy based on the Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), known as the Gravitational Search Test Generator (GSTG), which demonstrates competitive results in most system configurations and achieves higher combination coverage.
Due to different users' requirements, contemporary software has become feature-rich in terms of input functions (i.e., parameters) and selections (i.e., values). Exhaustive testing on sophisticated software systems is impractical as far as testing time and cost are concerned. Various test case design strategies have been proposed in the literature, such as equivalence class partitioning, boundary value analysis and decision tables. Unlike earlier works, combinatorial t-way testing supports the detection of faults caused by two or more input parameter interactions and thus efficiently minimizes the size of the test suite. Over the past few years, metaheuristic algorithms have appeared to be the most common choice for researchers since their effectiveness proves to offer optimal/near-optimal results. However, generating a t-way test suite is an NP-hard problem, and no single t-way strategy can guarantee to show superiority to others for all types of system configurations. Hence, this paper presents a new t-way strategy based on the Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), known as the Gravitational Search Test Generator (GSTG). The primary contribution of this paper is that GSA has adapted for the first time to t-way test data generation. The benchmarking results showcase that GSTG obtains competitive results in most system configurations compared to other existing strategies and addresses higher combination coverage (i.e., t <= 10). (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available