4.7 Review

Nanoparticle Size Effects in Biomedical Applications

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages 6471-6496

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c00987

Keywords

nanoparticle; size effect; biosensor; imaging; in vivo targeting; therapy

Funding

  1. DST-SERB, Government of India [CRG/2019/000030]
  2. CSIR, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review article focuses on the significance of nanoparticle size in biomedical applications and the optimal size requirement for achieving the best performance in various applications. By discussing the role and properties of nanoparticles of different sizes, the study analyzes their value and impact in biomedical applications.
Nanoparticle size plays a central role in determining material properties and performance in biomedical applications. A wide variety of functional nanomaterials and nano-bioconjugates have been developed for monitoring biochemical activity, controlling biological functions, and therapeutic applications. This review focuses on the role of nanoparticle size (typically in the range of 1-100 nm) in various biomedical applications, the origin of such a size effect, and the optimum size requirement for the best performance in different biomedical applications. First, we discuss various nanoscale units present in life processes along with their size and functional role. Next, we discuss the size-dependent properties of some well-known nanoparticles and how those properties are exploited in different biomedical applications. Next, we discuss the size-dependent performance of functional nanomaterials and nano-bioconjugates that are used in various biomedical applications. Then, we highlight some of the best designed nanoparticles of optimum size for specific biomedical applications. Finally, we attempt to correlate the origin of the evolutionary selection of various nanoscale units in life processes toward specific biological functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available