4.4 Article

Hand-Arm Vibration Controls for Jackleg Rock Drills: a Pilot Study Assessing Ergonomic Hazards

Journal

MINING METALLURGY & EXPLORATION
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 1933-1941

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s42461-021-00451-6

Keywords

Hand-arm vibration; Mining ergonomics; Work-related musculoskeletal disorder; Jackleg drill

Funding

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Training Project Grant [T03OH008630]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the effects of using anti-vibration gloves and handles to forearm muscle exertion and found that the reduction in HAV exposure from these controls was modest, while muscle exertion increased. This trade-off highlights the need for further investigation on the potential concerns among jackleg drill operators when choosing anti-vibration controls.
Jackleg drill operators are exposed to harmful levels of hand-arm vibration (HAV). Anti-vibration handles and gloves provide modest reductions in HAV exposures and forearm muscle exertion from the use of anti-vibration handles and gloves by jackleg drill operators. The goal of this pilot study was to investigate changes in HAV with the use of anti-vibration gloves and handles compared to forearm muscle exertion experienced by operators and measured with surface electromyography (EMG). Five subjects operated the drill under four different cases: no anti-vibration controls, anti-vibration gloves only, anti-vibration handle only, and simultaneous anti-vibration handle and glove use. Muscle exertion was expressed as a percent of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) and was compared using Welch's ANOVA with Games-Howell post hoc comparisons. The case with both anti-vibration controls in use simultaneously (largest grip diameter) was associated with a mean %MVC of 36.13% during operation for all forearm muscles combined, which was significantly higher than that of the other cases (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in mean HAV exposures. The anti-vibration handle with anti-vibration glove case only increased the maximum allowable exposure time by 8 min as compared to the control case without any anti-vibration controls. These results suggest that the modest HAV exposure reductions from the use of anti-vibration handles and gloves may pale in comparison to the increased muscle exertion resulting from their use, and this trade-off among jackleg drill operators is a potential concern that warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available