4.5 Article

Differences in metabolic syndrome indicators by body mass index of women with endometriosis

Journal

NURSING OPEN
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 3306-3314

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1047

Keywords

body mass index; endometriosis; metabolic syndrome; women

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2018R1A2B6001385]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B6001385] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to explore the relationship between metabolic syndrome indicators and BMI in women with endometriosis. The results showed that yearly changes in certain indicators of metabolic syndrome were significantly associated with BMI in these women.
Aim The study aimed to identify the relationships between metabolic syndrome indicators and BMI in women with endometriosis. Design A retrospective observational study design was utilized to analyse secondary data from a longitudinal dataset. Methods A total of 281,810 women diagnosed with endometriosis and aged 15 through 49 were drawn from the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort data of the Republic of Korea from the year 2009 to 2016. Body mass index (BMI) and five indicators of metabolic syndrome were extracted. Descriptive statistics, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, chi-square test and Cochran-Armitage test were used. Results Yearly changes in abnormal waist circumference, elevated fasting blood sugar and abnormally low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were statistically significant. The risk groups of these indicators all showed statistically significant differences according to BMI. The proportions of women with abnormal findings for all indicators significantly increased as BMI increased.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available