4.4 Review

Application of Collagen I and IV in Bioengineering Transparent Ocular Tissues

Journal

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.639500

Keywords

bioengineering; collagen type IV; cornea; lens; retina; collagen type I

Categories

Funding

  1. NHMRC
  2. SEHF
  3. Fudan-University of Sydney Partnership
  4. Fudan-University of Sydney Partnership grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Collagens are a major group of structural proteins expressed in various tissues, with different types having unique properties. In ocular tissues, collagen types I and IV play crucial roles in maintaining structure and transparency necessary for clear vision. This review explores the application of these collagens as biomaterials in bioengineering for treating ocular diseases that can lead to blindness.
Collagens represent a major group of structural proteins expressed in different tissues and display distinct and variable properties. Whilst collagens are non-transparent in the skin, they confer transparency in the cornea and crystalline lens of the eye. There are 28 types of collagen that all share a common triple helix structure yet differ in the composition of their alpha-chains leading to their different properties. The different organization of collagen fibers also contributes to the variable tissue morphology. The important ability of collagen to form different tissues has led to the exploration and application of collagen as a biomaterial. Collagen type I (Col-I) and collagen type IV (Col-IV) are the two primary collagens found in corneal and lens tissues. Both collagens provide structure and transparency, essential for a clear vision. This review explores the application of these two collagen types as novel biomaterials in bioengineering unique tissue that could be used to treat a variety of ocular diseases leading to blindness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available